Watching the news media since Donald Trump first threw his hat into the political arena for the 2016 United States Presidential campaign made me wonder why the Democrats are acting more antagonistic than usual. In fact, the entire Democratic process appears to be under attack. It can’t be just because of Donald Trump and his accomplishments as President. They should all be reveling because of the current economy, success in dealing with North Korea, ISIS, the United Nations, and the United States becoming a world leader again.
So what’s currently going on with the politics in this country? I believe I have the answer: Mass hysteria seems to be the only answer that fits.
(Source: Wikipedia) Mass psychogenic illness involves the spread of illness symptoms through a population where there is no viral or bacterial agent responsible for contagion. MPI is distinct from other types of collective delusions in that MPI involves physical symptoms. According to Balaratnasingam and Janca, “mass hysteria is to date a poorly understood condition. Little certainty exists regarding its cause.” Qualities of MPI outbreaks often include:
- symptoms that have no plausible organic basis;
- symptoms that are transient and benign;
- symptoms with rapid onset and recovery;
- occurrence in a segregated group;
- the presence of extraordinary anxiety;
- symptoms that are spread via sight, sound or oral communication;
- a spread that moves down the age scale, beginning with older or higher-status people;
- a preponderance of female participants.
Click here to read the full description.
In my early years I defined myself as a Democrat, however as years passed and I learned more about the Democratic party I began to feel embarrassed about my choice. I discovered the Democratic party had flipped the truth to accusing the Republican party of the atrocities for which they were they were responsible.
I listened to a gentleman of 65 years of age recently who had never voted because as he stated, ” It wouldn’t matter a damned bit who I were to vote for, they will say one thing to get elected and another after they are elected. All politicians are the same, they are only in it for the money and not money from their paychecks either. Money from the pressure of special interest groups.”
But in 2018 this man registered to vote in the midterm elections. He said he was proud to call himself an American again thanks to President Donald Trump and that Trump had kept and is keeping the promises he made to the American people of making America great again. This elderly gentleman added, “And I am proud to call myself a Republican; I will be voting Republican straight down the line. This Kavanaugh thing was a disgrace”
This now proud American and newly registered voter told me to watch a video of Donald Trump making a campaign speech in 2015 for the 2016 presidential election. He said it was not the speech which intrigued him as much as the second video which interrupted Trump’s video and is the reason he decided to register and to vote. Click here: Daily Mail
Today I was roaming around on Google Earth Pro and found some weird lines that look as though they were plowed into the floor of the Gulf of California beginning about 15 miles off the coast of Los Mélagos, Sonora, Mexico and over 4,000 feet deep according to Google Earth. The marks have been apparently dug into the ocean bottom because you can clearly see the debris pushed up on either side of the marks. You don’t need Google Earth to see them. They are visible on Google Maps as well and just as clearly.
Where the two long double lines intersect at the right there is a blue spot. You can see it more clearly when zoomed in. At first I thought it was maybe a deep crater, but as I zoomed in more It appeared as though something had been masked out to cover whatever was really there. Check it out for yourself and let me know what you think because it surely does not look natural to me.
The coordinates are: 26° 43′ 03.78 ” N and 110° 30′ 44.14″ W
Blue area zoomed in.
The recent event of Maxine Waters telling a group of people, “if you see anybody from that (Donald Trump’s) cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
This statement in my opinion should absolutely be considered an act of
threatening government officials of the United States and their families and Maxine Waters should definitley be charge with such since she has shown intent publicly to disruption the government function; and the possibility of inciting others to violence.
(Source: Wikipedia) Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service. Threatening other officials is a Class C or D felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Threatening federal officials’ family members is also a federal crime; in enacting the law, the Committee on the Judiciary stated that “Clearly it is a proper Federal function to respond to terrorists and other criminals who seek to influence the making of Federal policies and interfere with the administration of justice by attacking close relatives of those entrusted with these tasks.”
United States Sentencing Guidelines take a number of factors into consideration in determining the recommended penalty, including evidence of the person’s intent to carry out the threat; disruption to the government function; and the possibility of inciting others to violence. There is also a 6-level official victim enhancement, which makes the recommended penalty, per the sentencing table, approximately double that which would apply if an ordinary citizen were the victim. There can be many motives for making threats, including political motives or a desire to frame someone else for making the threat. The person’s intent can greatly affect the sentence.
(Source: Fox News) Netflix has struck a deal with President Obama and Michelle Obama to create original content for the video streaming service. I guess there were no more humanitarian projects anywhere on the planet that needed the attention of the Obamas, so why not go to Hollywood and cash in?
After all, unlike Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the Obamas never claimed to be socialists. They’ve already embraced the audacity of capitalism as part of the top 1 percent of earners, so when the opportunity to make even more money comes along, why not respond: Yes we can!
After I read this article I immediately cancelled my Netflix account, alongside so many other Netflix subscribers, after having it for many years. My decision to cancel was not politically motivated, it was just the logically correct thing to do. Although Netflix has moved so far to the left since first coming online, it was the accurate facts of Barack Obama’s leadership inabilities in the article I read that stirred my attention.
Perhaps Netflix will get the same message from the Obama deal that Google and Facebook got when they went against their subscribers and their subscribers and users began cancelling: “You’re going to lose a lot of money over this!”
Read the full article here: Foxnews.com